SoC – Consciousness, PK, and AI
ICRL’s president, Jeff Dunne, presents on the topic of Consciousness, Telekinesis, and Artificial Intelligence at the 2025 Science of Consciousness conference in Barcelona, Spain, 10 July 2025. In this presentation, Jeff explores the commonalities between modern LLM technologies and traditional divination tools like the Tarot, the I-Ching, and so forth; discusses the potential for AI to possess consciousness, and what it would look like if it does; and offers insights for effective guidance in how people should/shouldn’t utilize AI.
You can find a transcript of Dr. Dunne’s presentation here.
Launch of the FHE Art Installation
Understanding the nature of consciousness is intrinsically connected to the processes of self-discovery and the ability to communicate such insights to others… even (and perhaps even most importantly) when those insights defy words. In such circumstances, art is unquestionably our best language for such purposes.
In 2025, ICRL partnered with the Scientific and Medical Network’s Galileo Commission to create an enduring art installation that aims to capture different facets of what it means to be human. More than simply a collection of artworks, however, the FHE installation invites those who view the art, the experiencers, to contribute to the installation by sharing their own insights and reactions. In this way we aim to create a continually evolving project with new artwork and new interpretations.
In-Person Mini-Academy in Roanoke
An essential part of understanding the nature of consciousness is having a supportive community with whom we can share the journey, people with similar interests and unique perspectives. Towards this end, we are hosted an in-person gathering the weekend of August 16-17, 2025 in Roanoke, Virginia where seven people came together for two days of discussion, relaxation, food, and nature.
This was an experiment to explore how we could reimagine the events PEAR and ICRL held many years ago, called “Academies”. Those lasted a week, bringing people together to coordinate different projects and collaborations. This event was different, being focused not on research but on connection. We sought to explore options for how to best structure future activities. Should they center on research, experiments, collaboration, or social interaction? Should they be big or small? Short or long? While there is no definitive answer yet, there is no doubt that the event was well worth the time for all involved!
degree from Hollis University and has accumulated a diverse work experience, spanning multiple disciplines: education, technology, business and law, predominately in support and administrative roles. She currently works for the College of New Jersey in its Office of Disability Support Services. Lynn Ann has been an administrative assistant to ICRL’s President since 2011, and has extensive familiarity with the organization’s structure and activities, along with a deep commitment to its mission.
Vasileios Basios is a physicist, conducting interdisciplinary research on the foundations of complexity science and nonlinear systems, self-organization and complex matter. During his formative years, he was tutored by Ilya Prigogine, at ULB where he received his PhD, and by Emilios Bouratinos on meditation and philosophy. He is currently interested in the complex interface between action and information. Other interests include the history of ideas in science and their role in the transformation of science beyond the prevailing naïve, materialistic, mechanistic-reductionist world-view. With others from PEAR, he initiated the Mind-Matter-Mapping Project and has since published several essays for ICRL. He is also a member of the Board of the Scientific and Medical Network and the Steering Team of the Galileo Commission. Vasileios is inspired by the prospect of introducing self-reflection into the practice and understanding of science, and the emergence of a Self-Reflexive Science of Consciousness.
Ian Cook is a Professor of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, where he directs the UCLA Depression Research and Clinic Program at the Semel Institute and was the inaugural holder of the Joanne and George Miller and Family Endowed Chair in Depression Research at the Brain Research Institute. He has been a part of the PEAR/ICRL family since 1980, when he was among the first undergraduate students to conduct research at the PEAR lab. He graduated from the Yale School of Medicine and pursued his residency training and research fellowship at UCLA. His research has focused on understanding the relationships among the mind, the brain, and the body, and in translating developments in technology into more effective treatments for disorders of mood and cognition.
Bob (Brahmatirtha) was born in Newark, New Jersey, in 1949, completed his B.S. in Chemistry at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 1971, and received his M.S. in Geology from Rutgers University in 1975. After a twenty-year career serving as a geologist and vice-president of a large regional environmental company, he currently works as an environmental consultant to state governments. He has been a member of the Bhaktivedanta Institute since the inception in 1976, giving a presentation at their First International Conference on Life Comes from Life in 1977, and working on a multitude of projects with R.L. Thompson (Sadaputa) from 1995 through 2008. He is also a certified court mediator. He now serves as the Director of the Bhaktivedanta Institute for Higher Studies.
Carolyn is a writer and dancer, two avenues that support her central purpose as a healer. Through her numerous books she teaches that every moment brings unbidden opportunities from the universe, that every day of is filled with beauty and surprise. Ecstatic experience is the goal of her work, the personal to the cosmic. 
The largest dataset collected at PEAR used Random Event Generators, or REGs. These devices were essentially electronic coin flippers that produced a series of 1’s and 0’s; operators were instructed to influence the machines to produce more 1’s than 0’s or vice versa.
